Association between Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and Joint Hypermobility.

Joint hypermobility syndrome refers to increased joint flexibility beyond the normal range of motion. This syndrome has a benign form known as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3. This is a disorder in which hypermobility is accompanied by clinical manifestations in the absence of any systemic disease. A clinical finding associated with this condition is postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. The following is a rare case of joint hypermobility syndrome and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. The relevance of this case report lies in the impact that this disease had on the patient's quality of life and the limitation in the performance of activities of daily living.

Variación en la definición del examen articular para la clinimetría de la artritis reumatoide: resultados de una encuesta realizada a un grupo de reumatólogos colombianos / Variation in the definition of the examination of joints in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a survey conducted on a group of Colombian rheumatologists

RESUMEN Introducción: En el seguimiento de los pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) el examen articular (determinar el número de articulaciones dolorosas e inflamadas) es la piedra angular para determinar la actividad. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la opinión de un grupo de reumatólogos acerca del examen articular de los pacientes con AR al definir la articulación tumefacta o dolorosa y, de la misma manera, evaluar la variación en el examen articular entre los participantes. Métodos: Se aplicó un cuestionario, desarrollado por los autores, a un grupo de reumatólogos para explorar aspectos generales y específicos al examinar cada una de las articulaciones, además de conceptos de las definiciones de dolor y de inflamación en el examen físico. Resultados: El 78% de los entrevistados consideró que todos los aspectos eran importantes, como evaluar la movilización pasiva de la articulación, explorar el dolor a la palpación y el dolor espontáneo. El 53,8% consideró la movilidad pasiva sin que haya dolor o edema articular a la palpación. El 62,6% estaba de acuerdo con realizar la presión hasta cuando comienza a palidecer el lecho ungular del dedo del examinador. En el momento de palpar el margen articular para determinar la inflamación, el 55% estuvo de acuerdo y el 14,3% no estuvo seguro. Para el 47,2% eran importantes el derrame articular, la fluctuación y la alteración del rango del movimiento para definir la inflamación en el examen articular. Cerca de las tres cuartas partes estuvo de acuerdo con la técnica de las articulaciones temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, esternoclavicular, hombro y tobillo. Se evidenció que pocos estaban de acuerdo con la técnica en la articulación de la cadera. Al preguntarse por más de una técnica en algunas articulaciones, como las MCF (57,1%) y del tarso medio (45%), el porcentaje de los que estuvieron de acuerdo con una de las 2 técnicas disminuyó. Discusión: Al parecer no existe un método de examen formal, ya que hubo diferentes opiniones en las técnicas propuestas. Esto puede ser crítico, ya que el examen articular es la base de la clinimetría de la AR. Un porcentaje importante del grupo no estuvo de acuerdo o seguro acerca de algunos conceptos sobre componentes del examen, lo que denota una variación en los conceptos y esto podría llevar a la mala clasificación de los pacientes al determinar la actividad de la enfermedad, lo que impactaría en la estrategia T2T o treat to target. Conclusión: Existió una gran variación en la opinión acerca de los conceptos relacionados con el examen articular del paciente que padece AR al definir articulaciones tumefactas o dolorosas, por lo que se recomienda a futuro un proceso de estandarización como la mejor alternativa.

ABSTRACT Introduction: In the follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the physical examination of the joints in order to determine the number of painful and swollen joints is the corners-tone for determining activity. The objective of this study was to find out the opinion of a group of rheumatologists as regards the examination of joints of patients with RA to define the swollen or painful joint. At the same time an evaluation was made on the variation in the joints examination between the participants. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to a group of rheumatologists in order to determine general issues and examining each of the joints, as well as concepts of definitions of pain and inflammation in the joints. Results: The majority of the participants (78%) stated that all aspects were important, such as evaluating passive joint mobilisation, pain to palpation, and spontaneous pain. Passive mobility without having pain or swollen joint tenderness was said to be important by 53.8% of the participants, and 62.6% agreed with observing the pressure exerted by the examiner until the nail bed of the finger started to turn pale. As regards touching the margin of joint to determine swelling, 55% agreed, and 14.3% were not sure. Synovial effusion, fluctuation, and the alteration in the range of motion to define inflammation in the examination of joint were important for 47.2% of the examiners. Almost three-quarters agreed with the temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, shoulder and ankle joint technique. It was obvious that few were in accordance with the technique in the hip joint. When asked about more than one technique in some joints such as the MCF (57.1%) and mid-tarsal (45%) joints, there was a decrease in the percentage of those who agreed with one of the 2 techniques. Discussion: Apparently, there is no standard joint assessment method, since there were different opinions in the techniques proposed. This could be critical since examination of joints is the basis of the clinimetric examination in RA. A significant percentage of the group did not agree or were unsure of some components of the examination. This could lead to a variation in the concepts and a misclassification of patients in order to determine the activity of RA. This would also have an impact on the T2T or treat to target strategy. Conclusion: There was a wide variation in opinions about the concepts related to the examination of joints, such as defining swollen or painful joints in patients suffering RA. This requires a process of standardisation as the best recommended alternative.

Incidence and mortality of obstructive lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary disease represents an important extraarticular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the association of RA and interstitial lung disease is widely acknowledged, obstructive lung disease (OLD) in RA is less well understood. We therefore aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and mortality of OLD in patients with RA. METHODS: We examined a population-based incident cohort of patients with RA and a comparison cohort of individuals without RA. OLD was defined using a strict composite criterion. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OLD incidence between the RA and comparator cohorts to investigate risk factors and to explore the impact of OLD on patient survival. RESULTS: A total of 594 patients with RA and 596 subjects without RA were followed for a mean of 16.3 and 19.4 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of developing OLD was 9.6% for RA patients and 6.2% for subjects without RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-2.34). The risk of developing OLD was higher among male patients, among current or former smokers, and for individuals with more severe RA. Survival of RA patients diagnosed with OLD was worse compared to those without OLD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.47-2.97). CONCLUSION: Patients with RA are at higher risk of developing OLD, which is significantly associated with premature mortality. Effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to detect and manage OLD in patients with RA may help to improve survival in these patients.

Incidence and mortality of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been recognized as an important comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We undertook the current study to assess incidence, predictors, and mortality of RA-associated ILD. METHODS: We examined a population-based incidence cohort of patients with RA and a matched cohort of individuals without RA. All subjects were followed up longitudinally. The lifetime risk of ILD was estimated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the incidence of ILD between cohorts, to investigate predictors, and to explore the impact of ILD on survival. RESULTS: Patients with RA (n = 582) and subjects without RA (n = 603) were followed up for a mean of 16.4 and 19.3 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of developing ILD was 7.7% for RA patients and 0.9% for non-RA subjects. This difference translated into a hazard ratio (HR) of 8.96 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.02-19.94). The risk of developing ILD was higher in RA patients who were older at the time of disease onset, in male patients, and in individuals with more severe RA. The risk of death for RA patients with ILD was 3 times higher than in RA patients without ILD (HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.98-4.12]). Median survival after ILD diagnosis was only 2.6 years. ILD contributed approximately 13% to the excess mortality of RA patients when compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the increased risk of ILD in patients with RA. The devastating impact of ILD on survival provides evidence that development of better strategies for the treatment of ILD could significantly lower the excess mortality among individuals with RA.